Grain quality assessment

Part of experiment rbk1

Broadbalk grain quality data

The Broadbalk experiment was started in 1843 to investigate the relative importance of different fertilizers and manures on the grain yield of winter wheat. Since 1974, the wheat grain has been regularly analysed for standard grain quality characteristics.

Data available

BKGR_QUALITY: Broadbalk wheat grain quality, 1974-2018, on selected plots, containing:

See grain quality data available for details of what measurements are available, and from which plots and sections of Broadbalk. Data is available for Section 1 (continuous wheat) and the Section in the 1st wheat of the rotation every year, with other sections in other years.

Other data:

BKOATS : Broadbalk oats grain quality, 1996-2018, for all plots each year, containing:

Methodology and background information

TGWs: The thousand grain weight is the weight in grams of 1000 cereal kernels. It is determined using an automatic grain counter. After counting, the grain is dried overnight at 105 degrees C. TWGs are useful for determining the evenness of grain size (by comparing several TGWs). The TGW is also important when calculating the drilling rate for sowing cereals.

HFN: The Hagberg Falling Number is a recognised international test used by millers to assess the level of germination/sprouting within a batch of wheat intended for bread making. Developed in the 1950s, the Hagberg apparatus measures the time taken for a plunger to fall through a standardised hot slurry of milled wheat flour. As wheat begins to germinate it produces the enzyme alpha-amylase, which reduces the bread making potential of the wheat, and reduces the HFN. A HFN of 300 seconds or more is generally accepted as the cut-off point for bread making. A low HFN would reduce the value of the crop and could mean that the grain could only be sold for animal feed. The process includes 60 seconds of mixing, when the plunger is automatically rapidly lifted up and down by the mechanism. At 60 seconds, the plunger is released at its highest point so it can fall through the mixture. Thus the minimum possible reading is 60. THe HFN is determined on fresh grain. From 2016 the HFN is measured with a Perten Instruments FN1000, and is the mean of two readings.

HFNs in 2007 and 2010 were very low. This is probably because it was very wet around harvest, and the grain had started to sprout before it could be harvested.

HLWT: The hectolitre weight is the weight in kilograms of 100 litres of grain. It is calculated from specific weight of grain. Specific weight of grain is measured using a chondrometer and is equal to the weight in grams of a one litre volume of grain. HLWT is calculated from specific weight (grams per litre) as g/l x 0.10033 + 0.42119 = kg/hl. HLWT is determined using fresh grain, and the sample is weighed fresh.

HLWT is used to quantify the size of grains and the proportion of broken or thin, shrivelled grain. Millers use HLW to help determine the quality of grain and its potential end use as bread, biscuit or pasta flours.

Size classes: Size classes of grain are determined using a Winnower sieve, using fresh grain. The % of grain between 1-3.5mm is recorded. This is divided into the % between 1-2.25mm and the % between 2.25 and 3.5mm. The proportion of grain between 2.25 and 3.5mm is what would normally be used by millers for flour. This is calculated by subtracting the proportion of grain between 1-2.25mm from the proportion of grain between 1-3.5mm. A weighed sample is passed through slotted sieves. The same sample is sieved twice, using different sized sieves in turn. Screenings are undersized, broken or shrivelled grain between 1 and 2.25mm. Admixture comprises impurities, such as straw, chaff, weed seeds and earth, which must be removed before milling marketable flour. Screenings and admixture represent a loss to the miller, so a maximum of 2% is normally allowed.

In 2014, a few of the plots had a measurable amount of grain greater than 3.5mm. If you would like this data, please contact the e-RA Curators.

Galium tricornutum Section 8 Broadbalk
wheat grain

Non-herbicide plot section 8 Broadbalkp
Grain counter

Broadbalk elevated view
Hagberg falling number apparatus

Galium tricornutum Section 8 Broadbalk
Winnower sieve

Non-herbicide plot section 8 Broadbalkp
Half-litre chondrometer

Broadbalk elevated view
Litre chondrometer

Early studies

Hectolitre weights (HLWT), derived from bushel weights, are available for all plots and sections on Broadbalk from 1844 - 1955, for dressed grain measured at threshing. Bushel weight is the weight of a bushel of grain (one bushel = 36.369 litres). Bushel weights (measured in lbs/bushel) have been converted to HLWT (kg/hl), (one lb = 0.4536 kg). From 1844 to 1901 Broadbalk was harvested by hand, and then by binder until 1956. The sheaves were 'stooked' on the plot, then carted to a barn and stored until threshing in winter, when bushel weight was determined by weighing a bushel measure filled with grain (see Atkinson et al, 2008 in Key References below). The measurement of bushel weights was discontinued in 1955 (Johnston and Garner, 1969). If you would like access to this early data, please contact the e-RA Curators.

Related studies

Godfrey et al (2010) assessed wheat grain protein compostion and dough properties on selected Broadbalk plots, 2005-2007. See Key References below.

Atkinson et al (2008) looked at the relationship between grain specific weight/hectolitre weight and the winter North Atlantic Oscillation for plot 22 (FYM) Section 1 of Broadbalk, from 1844-2001. Grain specific weight was derived from the bushel weight of dressed grain, 1844-1955 (see Early studies, above). Specific weight was measured in archived samples of clean grain from 1956-2001. For further details, see Key References below.

Gutteridge et al (2003) investigated the relationship between take-all disease and wheat grain quality (TGW, HLWT, HFN and grain size) at other field sites at Rothamsted. For further details, see Key References below.

Grain protein content is an important property, determining suitability for breadmaking. A minimum protein content for breadmaking wheat in the UK is typically 13% dry basis. Protein % can be calculated as %N x 5.7. See Broadbalk Crop Nutrient Content for details of Broadbalk grain %N.

For more details, contact the e-RA Curators.

Acknowledgements

With thanks to Steve Freeman, Chris Hall, Andy Macdonald and Paul Poulton for help with compiling the information, images and text.

Key References

2020

  • Ben Mariem, S. , Gamez, A.L. , Larraya, L. , Fuertes-Mendizabal, T. , Canameras, N. , Araus, J.L. , McGrath, S.P. , Hawkesford, M.J. , Murua, C.G. , Gaudeul, M. , Medina, L. , Paton, A. , Cattivelli, L. , Fangmeier, A. , Bunce, J. , Tausz-Posch, S. , Macdonald, A.J. and Aranjuelo, I. (2020) "Assessing the evolution of wheat grain traits during the last 166 years using archived samples", Scientific Reports, 10
    DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78504-x
  • Lovegrove, A. , Pellny, T.K. , Hassall, K.L. , Plummer, A. , Wood, A. , Bellisai, A. , Przewieslik-Allen, A. , Burridge, A.J. , Ward, J.L. and Shewry, P.R. (2020) "Historical changes in the contents and compositions of fibre components and polar metabolites in white wheat flour", Scientific Reports, 10, 5920
    DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62777-3

2010

  • Godfrey, D. , Hawkesford, M.J. , Powers, S.J. , Millar, S. and Shewry, P.R. (2010) "Effects of Crop Nutrition on Wheat Grain Composition and End Use Quality", Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58, 3012-3021
    DOI: 10.1021/jf9040645

2008

  • Atkinson, M.D. , Kettlewell, P.S. , Poulton, P.R. and Hollins, P.D. (2008) "Grain quality in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment and the winter North Atlantic Oscillation", Journal of Agricultural Science, 146, 541-549
    DOI: 10.1017/s0021859608007958

2003

  • Gutteridge, R.J. , Bateman, G.L. and Todd, A.D. (2003) "Variation in the effects of take-all disease on grain yield and quality of winter cereals in field experiments", Pest Management Science, 59, 215-224
    DOI: 10.1002/ps.574

For further information and assistance, please contact the e-RA curators, Sarah Perryman and Margaret Glendining using the e-RA email address: era@rothamsted.ac.uk